医学教育研究与实践杂志

期刊简介

               《医学教育研究与实践》 (ISSN 2096-3181  CN61-1507/G4)(原名《西北医学教育》 (ISSN 1006-2769  CN 61-1257/G4)是我国最早创办的医学教育类学术期刊之一,创办于1982年,1993年开始在全国范围内公开发行( 邮发代号 52-133)。多年来,该期刊的办刊人员一直坚持“立足国内,放眼全球”的办刊理念,及时“捕捉”我国乃至全球最新的医学教育研究成果,该期刊也为我国各医学院校及其附属医院、教学医院的广大教师、医学研究生、医学教育研究人员、教育教学管理人员等进行医学教育学术研讨、展示其最新医学教育改革成果、交流其医学教育教学经验等提供了一个很好的平台。目前,该期刊的读者、作者群遍及我国各省、市、自治区,甚至港、台地区及国外,是其进行医学教育、教学实践的参考和良师益友。本刊发表的学术论文基本上代表了中国乃至世界各国当前医学教育领域的最新、最全面的理论成果,也是相关学者研究中国医学教育现状、推动医学教育改革的参考工具之一。 办刊宗旨:坚持正确的办刊方向,报道国内外医学教育动态,反映医学教育理论、医学教育方法和技术以及教学管理成果等,展示教育改革成果,交流优秀教学经验,服务我国医学教育教学实践。                

亚太热带医药杂志(英文版)征稿启事

时间:2023-08-11 10:34:00

68.jpg

Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine《亚太热带医学杂志(英文版)》(月刊),创刊于2008年,由海南医学院主办、国际著名出版集团Elsevier(爱思唯尔)出版、发行,是目前中国唯一一本全英文版的国际性热带医药期刊(月刊)。


Instructions to Authors

A manuscript will be reviewed for possible publication with the understanding that it is being submitted to Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine alone at that point in time and has not been published anywhere, simultaneously submitted, or already accepted for publication elsewhere. The journal expects that authors would authorize one of them to correspond with the Journal for all matters related to the manuscript. All manuscripts received are duly acknowledged. On submission, editors review all submitted manuscripts initially for suitability for formal review. Manuscripts with insufficient originality, serious scientific or technical flaws, or lack of a significant message are rejected before proceeding for formal peer-review. Manuscripts that are unlikely to be of interest to the Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine readers are also liable to be rejected at this stage itself.

Manuscripts that are found suitable for publication in Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine are sent to two or more expert reviewers. During submission, the contributor is requested to provide names of two or three qualified reviewers who have had experience in the subject of the submitted manuscript, but this is not mandatory. The reviewers should not be affiliated with the same institutes as the contributor/s. However, the selection of these reviewers is at the sole discretion of the editor. The journal follows a double-blind review process, wherein the reviewers and authors are unaware of each other’s identity. Every manuscript is also assigned to a member of the editorial team, who based on the comments from the reviewers takes a final decision on the manuscript. The comments and suggestions (acceptance/ rejection/ amendments in manuscript) received from reviewers are conveyed to the corresponding author. If required, the author is requested to provide a point by point response to reviewers’ comments and submit a revised version of the manuscript. This process is repeated till reviewers and editors are satisfied with the manuscript.

Manuscripts received from Editorial Board members will be screened by the Executive Editor-in-Chief and sent to external peer reviewers. The editorial board members who are authors will be excluded from publication decisions.

Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy edited for grammar, punctuation, print style, and format. Page proofs are sent to the corresponding author. The corresponding author is expected to return the corrected proofs within three days. It may not be possible to incorporate corrections received after that period. The whole process of submission of the manuscript to final decision and sending and receiving proofs is completed online. To achieve faster and greater dissemination of knowledge and information, the journal publishes articles online as ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance.